Antonia Schmidt vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 05:48 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Schmidt vs A. Vrancken Peeters

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Schmidt 1 - 0 Peeters
They have played 2 sets in total, with Antonia Schmidt winning 2 and Anouck Vrancken Peeters winning 0. The last match between Antonia Schmidt and Anouck Vrancken Peeters was at the W35 Erwitte, 13-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(6) 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schmidt | 1 |
| Peeters | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Erwitte(08-13-25)
A. Schmidt vs A. V. Peeters H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.06% (185-145) | Career Total W/L | 60.35% (137-90) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
A. Schmidt vs A. V. Peeters Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Peeters excels slightly over Schmidt in second serve points, scoring 39.84% compared to Schmidt’s 37.91%. Could this marginal edge influence the match outcome? It might.
- Regarding return games against second serves, Peeters again leads with 52.35% while Schmidt follows at 50.83%. Additionally, for returns on first serves, Peeters outperforms Schmidt with 37.56% against 34.86%.
- Under pressure, Peeters has saved 49.34% of breakpoints, slightly better than Schmidt, who saved 47.32%. This could be helpful for in-game betting forecasts.
- Peeters has a higher match-winning rate over the past year at 68.12%, compared to Schmidt’s 54.69%. Does this indicate a clearer favorite? Likely, yes.
- Analyzing surface performance, Schmidt shines on hard courts with a 60% win rate, whereas Peeters dominates on indoor hard courts with an impressive 81% win rate.
- In terms of playing level, Peeters gains an upper hand with a 64.29% win rate in higher-tier events, versus Schmidt’s 55.56%. Similarly, Peeters has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents.
- In deciding sets, Peeters continues to surpass Schmidt with a 67% success rate; Schmidt stands at 58%.
- Status on breakpoint conversion shows Peeters ahead with 44.56% conversion, contrasting with Schmidt’s 37.28%, indicating stronger capitalizing skills in critical moments.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
As we approach the upcoming match, key statistics point towards Peeters as the favored player, largely due to his stronger second serve and return stats. His ability to save breakpoints under pressure further boosts his chances in close-game scenarios.
Peeters' impressive performance over the past year, especially on indoor hard courts, provides additional confidence in his capabilities. Furthermore, his ability to convert breakpoints effectively establishes him as a more proactive and resilient competitor.
While Schmidt's performance on hard courts and deciding sets shows commendable skill, Peeters’ overall stronger metrics in nearly all comparative categories suggest he is more likely to emerge victorious in this head-to-head battle.
Antonia Schmidt vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Schmidt vs A. V. Peeters H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:35:34 | Average Match Time | 2:35:34 |
| 50% (41/82) | 1st Serve % | 57% (50/87) |
| 71% (29/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (33/50) |
| 34% (14/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (12/37) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 63% (5/8) |
| 48% (42/87) | Return Points Win % | 48% (39/82) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Schmidt Recent Matches Played
A. V. Peeters Recent Matches Played

A. Schmidt vs A. V. Peeters Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.06% (185/145) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.35% (137/90) |
| 54.14% (405/343) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.98% (305/221) |
| 52.20% (3638/3332) | Games Win/Loss | 54.04% (2602/2213) |
| 60.26% (47/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.27% (44/29) |
| 55.35% (119/96) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.21% (58/51) |
| 51.35% (19/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 79.55% (35/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 517 | Aces Total | 154 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.44 |
| 1093 | Total Double Faults | 1042 |
| 1:27:11 | Average Match Time | 1:39:38 |
| 413.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 428.44 |
| 62% (10649/17152) | 1st Serve % | 63% (8748/13841) |
| 63% (6722/10649) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (5192/8748) |
| 45% (2911/6503) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2233/5093) |
| 46% (962/2078) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (959/1862) |
| 45% (7632/16995) | Return Points Win % | 49% (6640/13649) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 53.18% (92/81) | Challenger W/L | 56.99% (53/40) |
| 59.24% (93/64) | Futures W/L | 63.16% (84/49) |
| 56% (182/326) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (136/225) |
| 54% (37/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (18/40) |
| 59% (54/92) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (42/74) |
| 87% (187/162) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (124/109) |
| 13% (187/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (124/15) |
| 16% (143/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (103/27) |